OF COURSE THE SHRINKS ARE NOT FIT TO PRACTICE MEDICINE, DESPITE THEIR FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS
by Benjamin Merhav

The AHRP report/article below proves that all psychiatrists "are not fit to practice medicine". This proof is true and convincing, but there is no need for such proof. Such a conclusion is automatically derived from the daily practice of psychiatry by its practitioners as follows. Firstly, because psychiatry is not a truly medical profession, as all its "mental illnesses" have been invented by shrinks, rather than discovered and scientifically proven as is required by medical science. Secondly, if there are no proven "mental illnesses" , then there is no place for psychiatric "treatments"(let alone compulsory "treatments"!) which in reality are very dangerous and very harmful to the patient-victims. Thirdly, any application of such harmful "treatments" is a violation of the Hippocratic oath of doing no harm by the medical doctor to the patient.

"Who Is Not Fit To Practice Medicine?

Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
Advancing Honest and Ethical Medical Research
www.ahrp.org

FYI

A British Parliamentary Committee Report deemed Rupert Murdoch "not a fit person" to run a major news reporting company based on his organizations illegal phone hacking activities.

Here is a compelling reason why psychiatrists who prescribe antipsychotic drugs are "not fit" to practice medicine.

At a minimum, the practice of responsible medicine requires that physicians who prescribe drugs whose  known severe adverse side effects are likely to cause their patients irreversible harm, requires that those physicians follow monitoring guidelines to ensure their patients' safety.  

The second generation neuroleptics (antipsychotics such as Clozaril, Zyprexa, Risperdal, Guiedon, Seroquel, Abilify) are known to cause severe, potentially lethal adverse effects.  These include rapid metabolic changes, including acute weight gain, and interference with normal glucose metabolism. These changes lead to increased rates of cardiovascular disease and premature deaths.

In 2003, the FDA required a warning label about the diabetes risk for people prescribed second-generation antipsychotic drugs. The American Diabetes Association and the American Psychiatric Association (APA) recommended glucose and lipid screening and monitoring for all patients starting these drugs.  

The drugs are widely misprescribed even for young children, whose safety is at high risk from those drug-induced metabolic changes.

Yet, studies examining monitoring rates for patients--young and old--who are prescribed these drugs, have consistently shown that psychiatrists fail to screen or monitor for either glucose or lipid levels in patients for whom they prescribe these drugs.  In 2008, Dr. Dan Haupt of Washington University, St. Louis, found that only 20% of patients prescribed antipsychotics were monitored for glucose levels, and only 10% had their lipids monitored.

The latest such study (Abstract NR7-51) was presented by Dr. Christina Mangurian, a University of California at San Francisco psychiatrist,  at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, May 7, 2012.  Her findings confirm the lack of metabolic screening and monitoring of patients prescribed antipsychotic drugs by psychiatrists--even as psychiatrists acknowledged that they should be doing the monitoring.
See: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/763468

Dr. Haupt suggested that psychiatry suffers from an "identity crisis," noting that:
  "Historically these are people who have gone to medical school but have not viewed themselves as physicians in the same way as an internist would."
See: http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ADAMeeting/9746

Vera Sharav "