Friday, May 25, 2012

The racket of Big Pharma-psychiatry continues to grow, despite the public protests
by Benjamin Merhav

Complete disregard for consumers, for mental health professionals, and for the public at large has been the trait shown by shrinks and by Big Pharma over many years now. It still continues today, despite the huge protests against psychiatry in the USA and elsewhere. The article below points out that this racket continues to grow. It is about the USA, but a similar situation exists around the world.

As always, behind the shrinks' words and actions stand Big Pharma, with the insatiable lust for ever increasing profits by the transnational pharmaceutical drug corporations. The shrinks expect in return, of course, a bigger share of Big Pharma's "cake", and so they keep up their atrocities against their patient-victims, making them consume ever more of Big Pharma poisons ; and they do their best to trap ever more people of all ages, genders and occupations to make them permanent consumers of Big Pharma poisons.


Anyone familiar with this preposterous and corrupt attitude by the shrinks, would have encountered the numerous lies they employ to achieve their above desired results. They first purport to "diagnose" a patient-victim, as "mentally ill". They then proceed to decide on the "necessary treatment", and if the victim resists they have him/her locked up to make the victim submissive. When the patient-victim complains about the "side-effects" of the forced drugs, he/she is told that it is his/her "mental illness" which is the cause of all the trouble, not the prescribed "medication". Moreover, there is always an alternative atrocity with which to terrorise a rebellious patent-victim, with death as the last atrocity to be perpetrated by the shrink against his/her patient-victim.


The enormously painful question is, of course, why not stop the psychiatric atrocities by making psychiatry illegal ? This is the question which must be addressed to every member of parliament - federal and state parliaments - as they are responsible for the scandalous status quo.

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/05/21/diseases-grow-at-psychiatry-meeting-thanks-to-big-pharma/

"Diseases Grow at Psychiatry Meeting–Thanks to Big Pharma

This is the year the APA puts the finishing touches on DSM-5, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a compendium that determines what treatments insurers will cover, what disorders merit funding as “public health” threats and of course, Pharma marketing and profits. Some question the objectivity of a disorder manual written by those who stand to benefit from an enlarged patient pool and new diseases. Furthering the appearance of self-dealing is the revelation that 57 percent of the DSM-5’s authors have Pharma links.

No kidding. Present at this year’s meeting were former APA president Alan F. Schatzberg, MD and Charles Nemeroff, MD, both investigated by Congress for murky Pharma income. Schatzberg and Nemeroff are co-editors of the APA-published Textbook of Psychopharmacology whose 2009 edition cites the work of Richard Borison, MD former psychiatry chief at the Augusta Veterans Affairs medical center who was sentenced to 15 years in prison for a $10 million clinical trial fraud. Also present was S. Charles Schulz, MD, who was investigated for financial links to AstraZeneca believed to alter his scientific conclusions.

Even though Assistant Secretary of Defense Jonathan Woodson sent a memo to all branches of the military in February about overprescription of antipsychotic medications like Seroquel and Risperdal for PTSD, military figures closely linked to that overprescription were also listed in attendance at the APA meeting.
Elspeth Ritchie, MD, told the Denver Post that AstraZeneca’s Seroquel was “very useful for the treatment of anxiety and combat-related nightmares,” though it was (and is) not approved for such treatment while she was medical director of the army’s Strategic Communications Office in 2008, participated in many symposiums. Ritchie, who is now chief clinical officer for the District of Columbia’s department of mental health, appeared in an AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly funded webcast for the Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry Academy in 2008 in which she lauds the use of “sophisticated” psychiatric medicines “on the battlefield.”[i]

Seroquel earned AstraZeneca nearly $6 billion in revenue last year, reports the Philadelphia Inquirer. “IMS Health, a healthcare information and services company, said that in the 12 months ending in February of this year, 14.1 million Seroquel prescriptions were written, more than any other antipsychotic,” it reports.
Also participating in the military and PTSD content at the APA meeting was Matthew Friedman, MD, Executive Director of the VA’s National Center for PTSD who reported, “I received an honorarium from AstraZeneca in the past year,” in a 2009 government slide show called “Pharmacological Treatments of PTSD and Comorbid Disorder.” Friedman also served as a Pfizer Visiting Professor at the Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine last year yet is listed in the APA meeting guide as having no “significant relationships to disclose.” APA officials have not responded to several requests for comment.

Of course disorders that Big Pharma has helped monetize like bipolar (which was termed “under diagnosed” and emerging in the elderly at the meeting) and “mood disorders” (once called “life”) were well represented. But an alarming amount of attention also went to the apparent new Pharma profit center of alcoholism and drug addiction.

Addiction specialists have known for more than 70 years that the only “treatment” for drug addiction and alcoholism (after patients are detoxed) are anonymous, self-help programs that are also free. In fact medicine is as powerless to understand or treat drug addiction and alcoholism as alcoholics and drug addicts are over their addiction.
Still the National Institutes of Health, in conjunction with Big Pharma, continues to spend millions, some say billions, developing “animal models” of addiction and vaccines to “cure” them. Nora D. Volkow, MD director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, says she seeks a vaccine to treat those at risk of alcoholism and drug addiction on the basis of “biological and environmental factors,” before they get sick. (See: treating those “at risk” for psychosis or depression or bipolar disorder on the basis of their family histories with no symptoms evidence.)

It is pretty fair to say Volkow is not an alcoholic or drug addict. Any of them could tell her they don’t seek “help” until they’re out of options–and even then not from a doctor but from each other. In fact, if Pharma, the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the American Psychiatric Association think they can treat a disease caused by drugs with a drug, that’s pretty insane. In fact, one of the treatments suggested for alcoholism at the meeting was quetiapine, also known as Seroquel."

Monday, May 21, 2012

MORE ON THE PSYCHIATRIC DOGMA LIES AND ON THE SHRINKS' IMPUNITY
by Benjamin Merhav
 
The very fact that the shrinks claim to practice a medical speciality, while everybody knows that psychiatry has no scientific foundation (see :

http://18thoutlawpsychiatry.blogspot.com.au/search?updated-max=2012-04-20T15:49:00%2B10:00 ), is both a big lie and the height of impunity. The recent interview pasted below of an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, USA, proves that too. Let us take a close look at what this interviewee says.

In his reply to the question "How can we distinguish between normalcy and illness?" he first admits that "the exact line between them is sort of impossible to draw," yet he contradicts himself immediately by stating that
"
normal and abnormal are like night and day". Surely, he knows about the Rosenhan experiment, which had proven already 48 years ago, that the entire psychiatric procedure of diagnosis and treatment of "mental patients" has no scientific basis, therefore no justification to force it on anyone ( see : http://18thoutlawpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2009/10/rosenhan-experiment-had-proved-that-any.html ).


Then he states the big lie of the psychiatric dogma, namely, his denial that psychiatric disorders are inventions or myths. He lies with impunity , as he knows that most mental health professionals are opposed to the latest edition of DSM precisely because it is made up of inventions and myths ! There is not a single "mental illness" ever discovered by psychiatry, as all the psychiatric "disorders and illnesses" had been invented by shrinks !

Dr. Fred Baughman, the renowned and honest American neurologist, has denounced psychiatry as a fraud because of these lies and because of the shrinks' impunity and their atrocities, which they continue to consider as "treatments"(see : http://18thoutlawpsychiatry.blogspot.com.au/2011/08/dr.html).

The closing paragraph of the interview is particularly revealing :


"Real adversity and toxic stress, maltreatment and deprivation — those kinds of things especially early in life can have long-lasting effects. We know there is plasticity throughout life — the brain responds to the environment. That gives us a lot of hope that even if there has been adversity or difficulty early in life, there are things we can do to help restore the course towards health."

There are several lies in this statement. First he says that"Real adversity and toxic stress, maltreatment and deprivation"during childhood are the cause for later trouble, yet these are precisely what the shrinks are doing to young children by psychiatric "treatment". The whole interview is based on the false premise that psychiatric "treatment" is for helping people, whereas in reality all the psychiatric "treatments" are atrocities and human rights violations ! There are many alternatives to psychiatric "treatments" if the genuine purpose is to help people (see short term alternatives here : http://14thoutlawpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2008/07/effective-alternatives-to-psychiatric.html . I have also pointed out the long term solution to all psychiatric problems here : http://14thoutlawpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2008/07/on-complete-alternative-to-psychiatry.html ). However, the shrinks are opposed to any alternative which might deprive them of their monopoly on mental health !

http://bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2012/05/20/gforce-interview-with-jordan-smoller-professor-psychiatry/qiG7fBb02ZeudplTxYuxWJ/story.html

"Striving to define normal

By Karen Weintraub

Dr. Jordan Smoller

Smoller, an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, has just written a book called “The Other Side of Normal.”
Q. You write in your book that psychiatrists are just starting to try to understand what it means to have “normal” mental health. Why is it important to understand normalcy?
‘Normal and abnormal are like night and day. We recognize that they're two dif-ferent states, but the exact line between them is sort of impossible to draw.’
A. The biology of normal teaches us about both our everyday life and also mental illness. Many psychiatric disorders are variations of some of the same brain systems that we use to navigate the challenges of everyday life. There's really a vast spectrum of normal in terms of how we adapt to life. By understanding that, by having a basic map of how the brain and the mind work, we can start to make sense of things, demystify and hopefully treat disorders that cause people a lot of suffering.
Q. How can we distinguish between normalcy and illness?
A. Normal and abnormal are like night and day. We recognize that they're two different states, but the exact line between them is sort of impossible to draw. We're comfortable with the fuzziness of twilight and that's probably where we're going to end up [with mental illness]. That doesn't mean psychiatric disorders are inventions or myths. We know that there are extremes of some of these traits or behaviors that cause people real pain and suffering.
Q. Are there examples of where having a definition of “normal’’ will make a difference in understanding disease?
A. We have circuits in our brain for detecting danger and harm. That's entirely normal. Sometimes [these systems] are active in the face of situations that are not really dangerous and they can take on a life of their own, they can go awry or go into overdrive. That is essentially what's happening in many anxiety disorders.
Q. So understanding “normal” anxiety can help us understand where anxiety becomes pathological?
A. It was an understanding of how the brain lays down emotional memories that led to a new avenue for treatment. [D-Cycloserine], a drug originally developed to treat tuberculosis enhances the function of emotional memory circuits. There have now been several studies suggesting that taking this pill an hour before cognitive behavioral therapy can boost effectiveness of therapies for panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Q. What role does life experience play in mental health?
A. At a neural level and even at a molecular level, experience — especially early experience — seems to affect the programming of our stress hormone systems, and how our genes tend to turn on and off.
Q. If early childhood is so crucial to future mental health, doesn't that put even more pressure on parents to get it right?
A. The brain is lying in wait for information that will help it organize basic functions like language and vision and emotional and social kinds of systems. But it's waiting for the ingredients that have been present throughout evolution — the presence of a caregiver, some degree of nurturing, some degree of exposure to language, exposure to social information. In the presence of that, kids do well. It's not about perfection.
Q. But adversity in childhood can have terrible effects on later life?
A. Real adversity and toxic stress, maltreatment and deprivation — those kinds of things especially early in life can have long-lasting effects. We know there is plasticity throughout life — the brain responds to the environment. That gives us a lot of hope that even if there has been adversity or difficulty early in life, there are things we can to help restore the course towards health."